Mr. Joachim Iroko, the man charged to court for naming his dog ‘Buhari’ has asked the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Ota, Ogun State, to dismiss the charge filed against him by the police.
It will be recalled that Mr. Iroko was arraigned before the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Ota, on August 22, 2016, on a one count charge of inscribing the name ‘Buhari’ on his dog and parading same in the Hausa section of the Ketere market in Sango area of Ogun State.
Mr Iroko has however denied the charge. In a fresh application filed before the court, Mr. Iroko, through his lawyer, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, he is challenging the constitutionality and legality of the charge, which he is asking the court to quash. In the motion on notice filed in court on September 16, 2016, Mr Iroko is seeking the following orders, from the court: He is further the court for an order quashing Charge No: 671C/2016 preferred against the Applicant herein for want of jurisdiction.
*An order setting down this application for hearing preliminarily. *An order staying further proceedings in this Honourable Court, in Charge No. 671C/2016, pending the hearing and final determination of this application.” The fresh application and prayers are predicated on the grounds that follows: *This court lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon charge No. 671C/2016, preferred against the applicant herein.
*The subject matter of Charge No.671C/2016 preferred against the applicant herein does not a criminal offence in law for which the applicant could be put to trial. *This court has the jurisdiction to quash a charge where there is no disclosure of an offence and the trial would amount to an abuse of the process of the court. *There is an inherent jurisdiction in this Honourable Court to prevent an abuse of its process.
*Charge No.671C/2016 as presently constituted is unconstitutional, null, void and cannot form the basis of any criminal trial. The case is slated for September 19, 2016.
Mr Iroko has consistently maintained that he has the legal right to give his dog any name and that the name ‘Buhari’ is not synonymous with or exclusive to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The case is being presided over by Magistrate B.J. Ojikutu ogf the Chief Magistrate’s Court 2, Ota, Ogun State
Blog Archive
- November 2019 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (24)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (7)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (6)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (44)
- January 2015 (1)
Total Pageviews
Home / Uncategories / Iroko The Man Charged To Court For Naming His Dog ‘Buhari’ Asks Court To Dismiss His Case
Iroko The Man Charged To Court For Naming His Dog ‘Buhari’ Asks Court To Dismiss His Case
Mr. Joachim Iroko, the man charged to court for naming his dog ‘Buhari’ has asked the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Ota, Ogun State, to dismiss the charge filed against him by the police.
It will be recalled that Mr. Iroko was arraigned before the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Ota, on August 22, 2016, on a one count charge of inscribing the name ‘Buhari’ on his dog and parading same in the Hausa section of the Ketere market in Sango area of Ogun State.
Mr Iroko has however denied the charge. In a fresh application filed before the court, Mr. Iroko, through his lawyer, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, he is challenging the constitutionality and legality of the charge, which he is asking the court to quash. In the motion on notice filed in court on September 16, 2016, Mr Iroko is seeking the following orders, from the court: He is further the court for an order quashing Charge No: 671C/2016 preferred against the Applicant herein for want of jurisdiction.
*An order setting down this application for hearing preliminarily. *An order staying further proceedings in this Honourable Court, in Charge No. 671C/2016, pending the hearing and final determination of this application.” The fresh application and prayers are predicated on the grounds that follows: *This court lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon charge No. 671C/2016, preferred against the applicant herein.
*The subject matter of Charge No.671C/2016 preferred against the applicant herein does not a criminal offence in law for which the applicant could be put to trial. *This court has the jurisdiction to quash a charge where there is no disclosure of an offence and the trial would amount to an abuse of the process of the court. *There is an inherent jurisdiction in this Honourable Court to prevent an abuse of its process.
*Charge No.671C/2016 as presently constituted is unconstitutional, null, void and cannot form the basis of any criminal trial. The case is slated for September 19, 2016.
Mr Iroko has consistently maintained that he has the legal right to give his dog any name and that the name ‘Buhari’ is not synonymous with or exclusive to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The case is being presided over by Magistrate B.J. Ojikutu ogf the Chief Magistrate’s Court 2, Ota, Ogun State
It will be recalled that Mr. Iroko was arraigned before the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Ota, on August 22, 2016, on a one count charge of inscribing the name ‘Buhari’ on his dog and parading same in the Hausa section of the Ketere market in Sango area of Ogun State.
Mr Iroko has however denied the charge. In a fresh application filed before the court, Mr. Iroko, through his lawyer, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, he is challenging the constitutionality and legality of the charge, which he is asking the court to quash. In the motion on notice filed in court on September 16, 2016, Mr Iroko is seeking the following orders, from the court: He is further the court for an order quashing Charge No: 671C/2016 preferred against the Applicant herein for want of jurisdiction.
*An order setting down this application for hearing preliminarily. *An order staying further proceedings in this Honourable Court, in Charge No. 671C/2016, pending the hearing and final determination of this application.” The fresh application and prayers are predicated on the grounds that follows: *This court lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon charge No. 671C/2016, preferred against the applicant herein.
*The subject matter of Charge No.671C/2016 preferred against the applicant herein does not a criminal offence in law for which the applicant could be put to trial. *This court has the jurisdiction to quash a charge where there is no disclosure of an offence and the trial would amount to an abuse of the process of the court. *There is an inherent jurisdiction in this Honourable Court to prevent an abuse of its process.
*Charge No.671C/2016 as presently constituted is unconstitutional, null, void and cannot form the basis of any criminal trial. The case is slated for September 19, 2016.
Mr Iroko has consistently maintained that he has the legal right to give his dog any name and that the name ‘Buhari’ is not synonymous with or exclusive to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The case is being presided over by Magistrate B.J. Ojikutu ogf the Chief Magistrate’s Court 2, Ota, Ogun State
About BIGG JEFF
This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.
RELATED POSTS
Iroko The Man Charged To Court For Naming His Dog ‘Buhari’ Asks Court To Dismiss His Case
Reviewed by BIGG JEFF
on
September 16, 2016
Rating: 5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
0 comments:
Post a Comment